What Facebook has become

I’ve been meaning to write this out for a while, but life has gotten the best of me over the past couple/few months.  I really need to get back on a regular blogging schedule, but we’ll see how that goes.  Hopefully my next post will be about what I’ve been so busy with (buying a house and moving across town), but we’ll see.

If you’ve followed me on Facebook for at least a year, you probably know that I make political posts sometimes.  You may have noticed that after the election was over, I slacked off, and if you’ve been following me since the last presidential election cycle, you’ll probably notice my political posts have generally waned.

This wasn’t an accident.  Politics are always relevant, and discourse is great, but Facebook has become more toxic than ever lately.  I’m not sure if that’s due to the current political climate or my own perception of the platform – and perhaps it’s both – but I lean toward it being the latter.  A lot of the people I am friends with were not politically involved until this election, or at least they weren’t vocal about it if they were.  I am pretty positive the 2012 election did not have this much Facebook commentary, but I’ve learned from 2008, 2012, and 2016 that political posts on Facebook are only good for fights and confirmation bias.  No one changes their mind on any heated issue because of what they read on Facebook.

And this leads me to the point of this post:  Facebook has become depressing.  When the platform first launched (or at least, back when my peers first started having kids, which was shortly after the Facebook launch), I used to groan when people posted pictures of their kids.  You know how cartoons and movies sometimes joke about the guy that’s always pulling out his wallet with an ever-expanding photo album of his kids inside of it?  He shoves it into someone’s face and the other person is awkwardly bound to look at the pictures and make comments.  That’s how I felt.

But Facebook was sort of different at the time, as Twitter wasn’t popular at all (that’s when my boys Leo Laporte and Kevin Rose (Internet famous tech nerds) ruled the Twitter roost instead of Lady Gaga or some other pop-culture celeb), Instagram didn’t exist, and neither did Snapchat or any other photo sharing social media platforms.  It was Facebook and I guess MySpace, and since that’s basically what my idea of social networks were, it didn’t feel like that’s what they were for (and it wasn’t just me; lots of friends complained about the same things).  I think what I use Facebook for now is basically short-form of what I used to use my blog for.

These days, I am more than happy to see pictures of my friends’ kids.  It’s good to open Facebook and see people spreading their joy amidst all of the negativity.  This recent election may have gotten a lot of people politically involved, but I hope they realize their friend circle can be a bubble of self-affirmation.  Let’s be real, when you see something you agree with, it reinforces that belief, and the more you see those things, the more negative the opposite viewpoint can appear.  It’s something we’re all susceptible to, including me, and maybe years and years of exposure to politically active communities before other people actually started caring last year is what has suddenly made Facebook feel so toxic.

It’s particularly frustrating for me because of how partisan the conversation is.  Every time the letter behind the name of the president switches from D to R or R to D, the conversation flips, and people that have been quiet for 4 or 8 years are now angry, while the previously angry people are now happily apologizing for any promise the president doesn’t keep.  The “Team R” and “Team D” mentality is absolutely infuriating, and the more I think about it, the more I realize that may be my biggest gripe about Facebook.

Anyway, it’s hard to say, and I definitely don’t want to block myself from opposing viewpoints, but the more I analyze it, the more I feel like Facebook isn’t the place for this kind of discussion.  Really, I’m not sure where that place is, but if I’m being honest, it’s much easier for me to ingest political posts on Twitter because Twitter doesn’t lend itself to debate.  It feels like nearly every time I’ve gotten involved in a political discussion on Twitter with someone that holds an opposing viewpoint, I end up excusing myself from the conversation because it takes two tweets to respond to one tweet, and then they take four tweets to respond to your two tweets, and so on until critical points are being missed and the “conversation” becomes unmanageable.

I think the bigger reason I find political posts easier to digest on Twitter is that on Facebook, you see a political post and then a war raging under it in the comments, likely involving many people you don’t know.  Twitter doesn’t show replies in your feed unless you follow both people.  Because of this, you end up seeing less garbage.

So, I’ve been unfollowing people on Facebook.  Honestly, it kind of sucks, but I’m tired of wading through 10 posts about how much Trump sucks for one post about someone’s personal life that I actually care about.  It’s not worth bringing your negativity into my life.  Sorry.  There’s nothing objectively true about your opinion (or mine) no matter how much you (or I) believe it, and while I may be more forgiving about posts that lean toward something I believe, those at least don’t frustrate me as much.  I’m sure that sounds terrible or whatever, but honestly, I don’t care anymore.  I don’t want to read your political opinion, especially if you only care to have one when your team isn’t in the White House, and even more so if I wouldn’t talk to you about politics in real life.  Actually, probably more that last part.

This is my commitment to my Facebook friends until further notice: unless there is a serious reason to post something political (the definition of “serious” will be up to my discretion), I won’t do it.  You may see me liking some political posts in your feed, but I don’t control how Facebook’s algorithm delivers updates to you.  If something that I like bothers you, please use Facebook Messenger to talk to me about it.  In fact, please use any messaging service (I’m on many of them) to talk to me about anything in general.

Apple’s fear of touchscreens on notebooks

So…I wrote this blog post for another blog a while back, and that blog has since gone neglected.  I don’t want to lose it, so I’m posting it here.  Enjoy!


As far back as 2008, I can remember wanting a Mac laptop with a multitouch display.  After playing with the original iPhone, I knew multitouch technology was finally good enough to put into a real computer, unlike those old, awful resistive touchscreens that had been in PC tablets for years.

iPad vs. RockI, as well as many others, was hoping the iPad would be that magic device that brought touch to OS X, but as we all know, the iPad ended up essentially being a larger iPod Touch and ran iOS.  In another case of “what techies want isn’t always what the market wants,” despite running iOS, the iPad was – and still is – a hit.  I was pretty down about the decision to run iOS, but I bought one anyway, and my parents ended up using it on weekend visits more than I did in general.

It’s easy to see why Apple would push iOS for their tablet rather than OS X.  iOS is built from the ground up for touch, and the iPad is indeed a touch-first device.  You don’t want to fumble with a dense UI designed for mouse and keyboard on a device that will rarely, if ever, have a mouse and keyboard connected to it.  And that’s not to mention that iOS is a way more profitable ecosystem for Apple.

But what about the MacBook line?  With touchscreens coming on more and more PC laptops, it feels like it won’t be long before it’s a standard feature, and having a Surface Pro 3, I can see why.  Touch is natural, and touch is fast.  On a desktop, sure, it doesn’t really make a lot of sense, considering how far away most desktop screens are from the user, but on a laptop, where the screen is literally inches from the keyboard…come on, that’s a no-brainer.

My argument for touch on MacBooks – and laptops in generally – is pretty simple.  Even in an OS that isn’t designed for touch, there are things that are faster and easier, or just more natural to do with touch, even over trackpads with touch gestures.  I generally don’t have issues using “desktop” Windows 8.1 or Windows 10 on my Surface in the first place, even though it was designed for mouse and keyboard, but that’s not the argument I’m making.  For example, to open a file, the workflow is as follows:  place your finger on the trackpad, locate the cursor, drag your finger to the icon, double click.  With a touchscreen, the workflow is: place finger over icon, double tap.

The argument here is that including a touchscreen doesn’t mean you have to use touch 100% of the time, or even 50% of the time, or even 30%.  Just being there when you want to use it for things that are faster, easier, or more natural with touch is the benefit; you don’t have to try to work touch into everything you do.

Touching a picture on a SurfaceSure, you can browse photos with your trackpad, and even use gestures to zoom or pan, but touching photos just feels so much better.  In fact, I’d say that directly interacting with photos is more natural and revives something in the digital experience that was lost in the transition from store-developed, printed photos to pixels on a screen.

Web browsing, for another example, is something that is almost always better with touch, but great to be supplemented by a trackpad and keyboard.  It’s easier and a more immersive experience to reach out and touch a link to open it rather than: touch trackpad, move cursor, click link – but it’s also easier to select text for copying with a trackpad in some cases.

No doubt, Microsoft has realized this, and that’s why the Surface line exists.  However, something like the Surface is not at all Apple-like.  Tim Cook has made it clear that he disapproves of hybrid devices like the Surface (though saying one thing has never prevented Apple from doing the opposite thing a year later), but more importantly, simply “activating” touch on OS X is not Apple’s style.  It’s more Microsoftian to give users what they want where they want it, and it’s more Appleish to guide users to what Apple thinks is best for them (which in this case, is iOS, if you’re in the market for a touchscreen device).  Neither of these is necessarily a better approach, but it does sort of preclude Apple from putting touch into their notebook line.

My verdict:  Apple isn’t going to change OS X, and thus will never put touch into any Mac running OS X, because in their minds, they already have an OS for touch.  If you’re waiting for a touchscreen Mac running a desktop-class OS, you might be waiting forever.  However, that doesn’t mean you’ll never get a touchscreen Mac notebook.  I have very little doubt in my mind that Apple is prototyping ARM MacBooks running iOS in their labs, but who knows if something like that would ever hit the market.  That’s certainly not something I’m interested in, but like I said earlier, what techies want isn’t always what the market wants.

iPhone 7 and “omg I’m switching to Android” thoughts

Let me start this post off by saying that I did not – and have no plans to – pre-order/buy an iPhone 7.  This is the first time I’ve attempted to go 3 years between phone upgrades, and it’s probably not for the reason you’d expect (MUH HEADPHONE JACK).  The reason I’m waiting is because other than the A10 Fusion processor, I find the iPhone 7 to be a pretty lackluster upgrade.  That combined with the fact that my iPhone 6 still works well means I just can’t justify the $649 purchase.  Then, there’s the another big reason: the rumors for the iPhone 8/10th anniversary iPhone/2017 iPhone are all things I’ve been wanting for years: wireless charging, smaller bezels, OLED display…literally some of the only things on the small list of Android phone features I’m jealous of.

But I’ve seen and heard a lot of stuff floating around on the Internet that’s just been ridiculous, and I just had to write about it.  So let’s do that.

The elephant in the room – the headphone jack is gone.

I get it.  You can’t use your favorite pair of $300 headphones anymore.  If you can’t afford or don’t want to buy new headphones to go along with your $649+ pocket computer, then the choice seems obvious:  switch to Android.  Honestly, if I was an audiophile with $300 headphones, I might be weighing my options as well.

But let’s make sure we look at the big picture first.  Lenovo has already dropped the headphone jack from the Moto Z.  More flagships will likely follow.  Not all, but many.  You may only be delaying the inevitable, but that’s just speculation.

I think the real kicker here is something I’ll cover later: Android devices don’t last as long as iPhones.  You might save $300 now, only to spend it later upgrading phones.  Note: this isn’t an empty claim that I will leave hanging.  It will be quantified and qualified later in this post.

“Bluetooth streaming quality isn’t as good.”  Legitimate argument if you’re an audiophile, which is why there are audiophile-quality lightning headphones out there that have interchangeable lightning/audio jack cables.

Yes, it is completely ridiculous and inexcusable that the EarPods you get with the iPhone 7 can’t be used on your Mac.  That’s why Bluetooth is the way to go, in my opinion.  A few weeks ago I pulled my (normally neatly wrapped) EarPods out of my bag and they were a twisted mess.  I spent about 3 or 4 minutes untangling them, and it just hit me: I get it.  Wires suck.  There was a sale on some Aukey Bluetooth earbuds for $9.99, so I bought them, and they’ve been pretty great, actually.  They’re kind of ugly, but I can deal with that until I buy something nicer.

The point here is that the argument that Apple is trying to move to a proprietary standard is completely bogus.  You can enter the Bluetooth earbud market for as little as $10, and you can get Audio Technica 4-star rated Bluetooth headphones from Amazon for $130, and for audiophiles, there’s the Bose QC35.

“I can’t charge my phone and listen to music with my old headphones at the same time.”  You’re right.  You can’t without a somewhat bulky $40 dongle from Belkin.  I’d be surprised if Mophie or someone else didn’t come out with a battery pack case that has a built-in Bluetooth transmitter, so you can plug headphones into the case and stream to your phone, but that’s not really the point.  Apple took away the 30-pin dock adapter and people were pissed.  But lightning is better.  Apple took away the floppy drive, and life is better without it.  If you think that Bluetooth technology won’t leap forward because Apple is taking away the headphone jack, then you don’t understand the precedent here, or possibly just markets in general.

Apple has almost always held a smaller marketshare than their competitors, but they have a dedicated user base.  Honestly, I’m pretty sure the only people that are saying “I’m going to switch to Android” after seeing the iPhone 7 are people that were on the edge anyway.  The iPhone 7 very likely won’t be a flop. Maybe it’ll sell less than the 6S or 6, but that’s not very telling of the headphone jack as much as it is of the 7 in general.

“Welcome to 2014, iPhone users!  Android has had all of this stuff for years!”

I saw this image floating around on reddit, and it’s one of those things that makes me wonder if the creator knew s/he was lying, or they are actually that braindead.  For some reason, some people can’t wrap their head around the fact that a spec sheet is not the end all, be all when it comes to phones.  I guess they have it in their head that “more is better” and there’s no convincing them otherwise.

Look, if I was building a gaming PC, which I have done, clearly I would be spec’ing that rig out.  But when I bought my MacBook, I just wanted it to work.  You could look at the spec sheet for a MacBook (non Pro) and have a fit of nerd rage because it has a Core M processor, or you could breathe and realize that what it’s meant to do doesn’t require more power than it has (which is a point that I’m making as a side note, because the iPhone 7 actually blows every other smartphone out of the water in terms of CPU benchmarks).

  • 750p iPhone 7 / 1440p Nexus 6

Most people can’t tell the difference between 720p, 1080p, and quad HD on a screen that small.  Some can, but most can’t.  I also seem to recall reviews saying the Nexus 6 screen was good, but not great.  Quad HD displays also consume more battery and use more processing power on graphics.  None of these things translate well to spec sheets.  The iPhone is faster, has better battery life, and results in an extremely similar experience as far as how the display looks.  The thing that Apple is sorely lacking in this department is an OLED display, not some ridiculously high pixel density.

  • Water resistant

The Nexus 6 was not rated to be water resistant.  The iPhone 6S had water resistance; Apple just didn’t market it because there was no rating.  I’ve washed my iPhone 5 with soap under a faucet, and it still works (dropped it on a public bathroom floor, nope nope NOPE).  This bullet point is just dishonest.

  • 12 MP camera iPhone 7 / 13 MP camera Nexus 6


No, seriously, hahahahahahaha.  You’ve never taken pictures with either phone.

  • Raise to wake

This feature works on iPhone 6S, SE, and 7.  Because iPhones actually get updated.

  • Notifications on lock screen

This one is just bizarre.  iOS has had this literally for years.  This person is clearly just drinking the Kool Aid and hasn’t used an iPhone since like 2009.

  • Contextual word prediction

I have this on my iPhone 6 and I can use 3rd party keyboards?  Why is this here?

  • Photo search

You do realize that Google Photos is available on iOS, right?


And then there’s this weird blurb at the bottom: “In 2018, you guys will love wireless charging, VR support, curved displays, multi-user support, selectable default apps, app installs from a browser, and seamless updates!”

Clearly, the wireless charging thing is legitimate.  No Qi charging, lack of OLED displays, and large bezels are my biggest gripes with the iPhone.  You’ve got me there.  But VR support?  You can put goggles on an iPhone.  I have Google Cardboard.  I’m sure it won’t support Google Daydream, but neither did the Nexus 6 that you’re comparing the iPhone 7 to. Google Daydream is releasing this fall.

Curved displays, app installs from a browser…I just don’t care.  I’m not a big fan of the Galaxy Edge and I hope Apple doesn’t do that.  Selectable default apps have been addressed with iOS 10, so try 2016, not 2018.  Multiple user support barely makes sense for a phone, which is literally the most personal device I can think of.  Maybe if you’re handing your phone off to your kid so they can play a game in the car, but that’s it.  iPads have multi-user support, which is where that actually makes a lot of sense.

But the real kicker in this closing remark is “seamless updates.”  I’m really scratching my head over this one.  iPhone updates are a colossal reason that the platform is subjectively better than Android.  How exactly is “Google releases update > handset manufacturer releases update for specific phone model > carrier okays update 3 months later” a more seamless process than just going into your settings and pressing “Install update” the day it’s launched, on any iPhone made in the last 4 years?

The person that wrote this is either incredibly disingenuous, braindead, or is so drunk on the Android Kool Aid that s/he’s literally willing to ignore reality.


Remember when I said earlier that I would quantify and qualify my argument that iPhones last longer than Android devices?

I have an iPhone 5 on the shelf across the room.  If I wanted to, I could pull it out on Tuesday, press the update button, and be running iOS 10 on a 4 year old phone.  Find an Android phone – any Android phone – released in 2012 or earlier that will run Android Nougat.  Please, do look.  My 2013 Nexus 7 LTE is already obsolete according to Google, and it’s just 3 years old.  No Nougat for it.

“Why would you want to use a 4 year old phone anyway?”  Some people don’t buy phones every year, some people use hand me downs, whatever.  That’s not the point.  If you’re going to make the argument that Apple is evil for removing a headphone jack that has at least 2 viable alternatives and other less viable alternatives, but you won’t make the argument that Google is evil for declaring 3 year old devices “end of life,” or other Android handset manufacturers taking months to update their flagship phones with critical releases, then you’re the worst kind of person.

Remember how I said specs aren’t everything?  This is a fun one you can’t put on spec sheets.  Android has crappy battery life, and Google has been taking steps to remedy that with Doze and Doze on the Go.  But in the meantime, handset manufacturers have been trying to remedy that with bigger batteries.

So the fanboys look at the spec sheet and say “3,000 mAh battery in my Android and 1800 mAh battery in your iPhone lolololol” when in reality, the phones have the same battery life in terms of actual usage, or the iPhone totally destroys Android in standby.  But wait, that’s still not my point.

So suddenly, batteries in Android take forever to charge because they’re so much bigger (iPhone batteries still charge quickly, something else that rarely makes the spec sheet), so handset manufacturers adopt quick charging formats, and of course, this makes the spec sheets and the Android fanboys go nuts again.

But here’s a fun fact: quick charging technologies literally kill your battery faster than regular charging.  Yes, they degrade your battery life over repeated usage.  Tesla recommends you use their superchargers only when you need them and not all the time for this very reason.  So now, you’ve got a bunch of people out there constantly quickcharging their Android phones, and suddenly their big 3,000 mAh battery isn’t keeping up anymore.  My iPhone 6 is at 93% of original battery capacity after 2 years, and it charges quickly.  Once again, this doesn’t make the spec sheets.

When I switched to the 2014 Moto X (2 GB of RAM), one of the reasons I switched back to my iPhone 6 (1 GB of RAM) after 3 months was because Android got slow.  Very slow.  Apparently there was a bug in 5.0 that was fixed in 5.0.1 or 5.1 or whatever it was, but wouldn’t you know that the update that fixed that bug had to go through Motorola first? (Not only that, if you look at comparison videos, Apple devices consistently perform better than Android devices with double or triple the RAM.)  So I was stuck on a slow Android release at the mercy of Motorola, even though my Moto X was carrier unlocked and didn’t need to go through anyone past the manufacturer.

The fact is if you don’t buy a Nexus device (or I guess Pixel, pretty soon), this is your life.  You’re beholden to the handset manufacturer.  Of course, Google is trying to rally them to commit to updating quickly, but it doesn’t matter if this means a 1 month turnaround on updates, or 2 weeks, or 4 days, it doesn’t change the fact that Apple can push updates immediately.  Even Microsoft is doing this with Windows 10 for Phones, just like they’ve done on computers for years (can you imagine if every Windows update had to pass through Dell, HP, Lenovo, Toshiba, etc?  What a nightmare that would be!).

So maybe if you’re an audiophile with $300 headphones, you’ll have have to adapt to the iPhone 7, or maybe you’ll feel like you’re forced to buy new headphones.  But you can buy the iPhone 7 and feel confident, based on an actual track record, that you can use that phone for 4 years.  And you won’t have to replace the phone after 2 years because battery capacity was annihilated by quickcharging, and you won’t feel abandoned after 6 months because Motorola stopped supporting it, and you won’t have to wait weeks for under-warranty repairs without a phone like many Android users fall victim to, and you have access to most apps before Android users do.

Look, I don’t even hate Android.  I just don’t like Android super-fanboys, or people that rabidly hate Apple because ‘muh walled garden’ or whatever the hell it is that makes them so angry about life in general.  A lot of Android devices are really cool and do have features that iPhones just don’t have, but you can’t pretend like Android is objectively better than iOS.  It’s such an asinine outlook to have, and requires such a narrow view on reality to maintain.

Maybe it feels like the iPhone 7 not having a headphone jack is a big deal right now, but rest assured, Tim Cook isn’t on his way to your house to burn it down (I think that’s currently Samsung’s job…whooaaa sick Galaxy Note 7 burn).

Pokémon Go…or something, whatever

A lot of things have happened since I’ve last updated my blog, but each time I think about writing a post, I realize I’m not entirely sure what I want to share here anymore.  Twitter is the best resource to keep up with what’s going on my life right now, to be honest.  My blog has turned into more of a place for me to dump long-form thoughts.

That said, time to dump some thoughts. :D

I’ve been playing a lot of Pokémon Go, and despite its tumultuous rollout, I’ve been having a lot of fun with it.  There’s a gym down the street from where I live, and three more within reasonable walking distance, where I can also hit 9 Pokéstops along the way.  It’s a long walk, but I enjoy it.

A lot of the game mechanics are sort of…broken, or “unbalanced” is a better word, I guess.  Stardust doesn’t scale very well, evolved Pokémon trade in for the same amount of candy as their unevolved counterparts, Pokéstops have seemingly recently all but stopped dropping hyper potions…the list goes on.  Niantic has had, and continues to have, their heads in the sand for the most part, especially with the tracking issue, which was made even worse by their complete lack of communication for weeks.

I think a lot of people quit the game, but even with certain things still broken or very unbalanced, I continue to play.  I won’t spend any real money on the game until they address the issues, but the game is still very much playable (which is not something I could say with much confidence for the first few weeks).  Right now, what’s fun for me is collecting Pokémon and specifically focusing on keeping the gym down the street.

Oh, and I guess I should mention that I’m dumb and didn’t realize the teams were based on the legendary birds.  I chose Team Valor (red team) for a completely dumb reason (didn’t understand how gyms worked), and totally didn’t realize I should’ve been on Team Instinct.  (Anyone that knew me back in the day knows Zapdos was my favorite Pokémon).  Valor is the last team I would’ve picked if I had understood gyms, because Moltres is my least favorite legendary bird and red is my least favorite color of the three.  Sigh.  At this point though, even if they introduce a mechanic to switch teams, I’m not sure that I would.

In non-Pokémon-related news, I bought a new car about a month and a half ago.  It’s been at the point for a long time now that with my back/nerve problem, driving a sports compact with a manual was making less and less sense.  This is one of the few things I haven’t posted about on social media, mostly because it almost feels like bragging, when in reality I liked my BRZ a lot and had planned to keep it for a long time otherwise, and now I just want to be comfortable.  My new car has Apple CarPlay, by the way, which I will say is awesome and I don’t think I’d buy another car that didn’t either come with it or couldn’t be upgraded to it via an aftermarket unit.

Also, I think it goes without saying here that this election is ridiculous.  Anyone that knows me probably knows who I’m voting for, but I will say it is nice to have Bernie out of the picture.  To me, he’s been the most frustrating politician to emerge out of the woodwork this season, demagoguing his way into relevancy in a near-Trumpian fashion, only to sell out in the end to the very establishment he claimed to be so separate from.  What a joke.  He honestly cannot fade back into obscurity quickly enough.

So that’s that for a while.  Happy Pokémon hunting.  :)

My writing projects for the past ~7 months

I finished up a novel that began with a story I wrote three and a half years ago called Tracks (which is the working title of the novel as well).  I went over it once for editing then set it aside and began something else.  Unless I like Tracks a whole lot better when I go back to it for a second round of editing, I don’t think I’ll publish it.  It doesn’t feel cohesive and has what I feel is too much confusing exposition in the dialogue.  I do really like the first chapter, though, and it stands alone just fine as a story if you’d like to read it via the link above.

The other work I began writing is yet another story I started a couple years ago that has a working title of SASPER.  It’s probably my most ambitious work of fiction thus far, mostly because it’s cyberpunk, which is technically science fiction, and science fiction can go horrendously wrong if you don’t pay attention to details, do proper world-building, use real science amidst the fiction, etc.  One thing I’m doing with this novel that I don’t normally do is use real places by name, and another is to generally not care about chapter lengths.  Anyone remember that chapter of As I Lay Dying that’s just a single sentence?  I’m not doing anything that dramatic, but you get the idea.

SASPER feels like it’s somewhere between a third and a half of the way done, but I don’t ever set length expectations for total number of words or anything like that, other than 50,000 or more since that’s technically the minimum for a novel.  When finished, SASPER will be my fourth completed novel, and if I feel like it’s good enough to publish, then probably my second published novel.  So far, I feel like it’s on track to meet that goal, unlike Tracks.

Another interesting thing of note is that I wrote Tracks in first person perspective in past tense, but for SASPER, I switched back to third person present tense like I used in the novel I wrote based off of The Redwoods (which is my one published novel).  I really like something about this particular perspective/tense combination, even though there are times when it’s really hard to stay in the right tense.

Bullet-point 2015 MacBook quick review

The list below reflects the 1.2 GHz/512GB SSD model of the 2015 MacBook.  I mostly use it for web browsing, taking notes, research, and writing, so keep my use case in mind.

  • Performance is great on El Capitan.  Scrolling through photo-heavy sites in Safari suffered a bit in Yosemite.  That was resolved in El Cap.  The Core M CPU was really the only tradeoff on this computer that I wasn’t sure would be a non-issue, and so far, so good.  Future OS X updates will tell if this holds true.
  • It’s so thin and light that sometimes it’s hard to believe there’s a fully-functioning computer in there.
  • Battery life is amazing. 9-10 hours and can be recharged from a battery pack and a USB-A to USB-C cable if you need more absolute portability for some reason.
  • The keyboard is a love it or hate it thing.  I love it, despite the lack of travel.  If you don’t like it immediately, I’d say give it a day or so of casual use.  It’s very satisfyingly clicky.
    • Note: Of the ~60,000 words into the novel I’m currently writing, I’d estimate a third or so was written on the MacBook.  So, I have used it substantially.
  • If you try to run a game on it, it’s going to get pretty hot.  I don’t know why you’d buy an ultraportable laptop to game on, but Steam in-home streaming actually works amazingly well if you have a decent PC to stream from.  I played Fallout 4 for a few hours like this on ultra-high settings.
  • The trackpad is incredible.  Apple has always had the best trackpads in the business and they keep making them better.  Easily the best trackpad I’ve ever used, twice as good as the one on my 2010 MacBook Pro.
    • Note: Force touch is neat, but kind of gimmicky other than to allow the laptop to be so thin.
  • The display is gorgeous, exactly what I’d expect out of a pixel-dense Apple display.  I usually keep it around 60% brightness just because it’s so bright.
  • I’ve used the USB-C port with an adapter only one time in a month and a half (to install Windows).  Having one port is a non-issue for me.
    • Note: USB-C is awesome.
  • I haven’t even used the webcam, so the 480p resolution is a non-issue for me.  No other comments there.
  • The hinge and magnets are so utterly perfect.  The machine opens and closes with exactly the right amount of resistance.  Apple’s attention to detail really shines in these kinds of things.
  • This machine is kind of stupidly expensive.  I only bought it because of some great promos on my Discover card that allowed me to save about $500 off of the retail price of $1599.
    • Note: The less expensive/cheapest model is $1299, which is honestly still a bit much, even for the model I got.  But, you know…Apple.
  • Filed under most surprising feature: the speakers are phenomenal, especially given the amount of space they’re in.  Seriously, they sound better than the speakers on my 2010 MBP by a long shot.
  • I got Space Gray, and it’s a super cool color for a MacBook.  The Gold (which is actually more “champagne”) is surprisingly nice and much more subtle than you’d expect in person (this would’ve been my second choice in color).

I don’t like subscription music streaming services

I tried Apple Music, Google Play Music, and am now currently working my way through a 3-month free trial of Spotify, and I have to say…these subscription music streaming services just aren’t for me.  I think the best of the bunch was Google Play Music, with Apple Music being the worst solely because of the app, but it’s not really so much any of that as it is that I think it’s a bad deal financially for me and a lot of others.

For a family of two or three that doesn’t already have a music collection, I get the perceived value.  $15/month for three people to have access to unlimited music is a good deal if at least two of those people normally buy at least an album a month (or spend the equivalent ~$10 on individual tracks).  It’s probably also a pretty good deal for a single person to pay $10/month if they usually buy three or more albums in a month.

The major problem to me is that even with a subscription to one of these services, you still might have to buy music somewhere else.  Want to listen to Adele’s latest album on Apple Music?  Nah, gotta buy that.  Want to listen to Taylor Swift’s 1985 on Spotify?  Nah, you gotta have Apple Music or buy it.  Heck, there was this album by a no-name band (Allstar Weekend) that Amazon Prime Music and Google Play Music have but that Apple Music doesn’t.

So no matter if you’re listening to mainstream stuff or little unknown bands, you’re never guaranteed that your service is going to 100% fulfill your listening needs.  So suddenly, you might be paying $10/month for streaming plus an extra $10 to buy an album that’s not on your streaming service.  And then, you might not be able to listen to all of that music in the same place if you have something like Spotify, so you’re juggling collections between two apps.

Oh, and if you cancel your subscription service in, say, three years, you’ve paid $360 and have nothing to show for it except memories.  And hey, maybe that’s worth it to you.  But the thing is, in 2006, I was buying two or three albums a month, and now, I’m buying one album every two or three months.  So nine years ago streaming would’ve made sense to me, and now, it doesn’t.  So if I had been using a streaming service for the past nine years, I couldn’t even cancel it now or I’d lose all of my music (which, yes, I do still listen to my old catalog – everything from random 90’s country to my amazing 2006 pop-punk bands).  People’s music listening habits change, so what you do now might not be what you do next year.

So yeah, I’ll pass on these services.  Right now, buying albums I like (sometimes on sale for $0.99, $7.99, or half off sales), then uploading it to Google Play Music so I can stream it anyway is the best option for me.

You can’t make nerds happy

Yesterday, Apple introduced a “smart battery case” for the iPhone 6 and 6S, and the techs sites on the Internet went completely nuts.  I had to write something about this whole situation somewhere, because it’s so ridiculous.

For a while now, a specific segment of the phone market has been wanting Apple to make the iPhone slightly thicker to incorporate a larger battery.  The complaint is that Apple always puts form over function, despite the iPhone 6/6S already having an all-day battery life.  So, Apple finally puts function over form, and people still won’t stop whining.

And then on the other side, you’ve got the Apple apologists that try to explain that you can’t put a bigger battery into the iPhone because there’s heat and RF signal issues to deal with, despite, you know, basically every flagship Android handset not having those issues.  I’ve also seen people say that Apple already makes a phone with a bigger battery, it’s called the iPhone 6S Plus, which is an utterly stupid thing to say, because of how wide and tall that phone is.  The apologists’ argument is basically that Apple can’t make an iPhone that’s the thickness of the iPhone 5 at the size of the iPhone 6 “because physics” (which is total BS).

Being in Apple’s position is so interesting, because no matter what they do, people whine.  Clearly – as the world’s most valuable company – they’re doing something right.  The Internet just won’t stop complaining about everything they do.

Lily and Mochi

I have been pretty terrible at updating my blog for the past three or four years.  I know I say this often, but I’m going to rectify that with a little life update post right now.

LilyPretty much everyone that reading this already knows about Lily, the Pembroke Welsh Corgi that Sam and I picked up on June 7, 2013.  She was born on March 17th, 2013, which is the day St. Patrick’s Day fell on that year.  Her breeders called her “Patty” because of this (yes, I know it’s St. Paddy’s Day, not St. Patty’s Day).
She was 8.2 lbs when we got her (most of it ears, probably).  We picked her up when she was 11 weeks old, which means she was a little bigger than most puppies are when people usually pick them up (~8 weeks).  We would’ve gotten her earlier if it were possible, but it wasn’t, and it certainly didn’t deter us.

When we first started looking into getting a corgi, I didn’t know that there were two breeds: Pembrokes and Cardigans.  Lily (as I mentioned) is the former of the two, which is the most popular breed.  Apparently there are around 20 Pembrokes to every Cardigan.  We picked getting a Pembroke I think mostly based on their popularity and that they’d be easier to find.

I wanted a tri-color at first (white/black/tan, etc), but I wasn’t really super picky about that.  The more I looked at pictures of puppy and adult corgis, the more I liked the tan and white color combination and changed my mind as to what I would prefer.  I don’t remember if Sam had any preferences regarding whether the puppy was a boy or girl, but she also wasn’t particularly concerned about the color.  So though I had my preferences, color wasn’t strict, but the sex of the puppy was (the men in my family swear that girl dogs are easier to train and are more well-behaved in general, and they’ve had plenty of dogs).

LilySam happened to find a breeder that had one girl left in tan and white, which was exactly what we wanted, if we’d been given the choice.  I’m certain Lily could’ve been any color and we’d have still wanted her, but that’s just the way it happened to work out!  The breeder was trying to figure out if she was going to make “Patty” a show dog, and I think she probably would’ve had she not been “mis-marked”.  Show dogs have to be marked a certain way or they’re not eligible to show, and puppies’ markings are a bit hard to discern when they’re young.  It turned out that Lily’s face is half tan, half white, and definitely not symmetrical, so she was considered mis-marked.

That means that breeder had one extra unclaimed puppy right at the time that Sam reached out to her, which in the corgi world, is very unlikely.  You typically have to put your name on a waiting list and be willing to wait half a year or more to get an AKC, purebred corgi puppy not from a puppy mill.

LilyLily is now a full grown, 23.5 lb spoiled brat dog.  She’s a little small for an adult female corgi (I think they’re usually 25-28 lbs), but she’s very majestic when she’s not sleeping.  She listens halfway-decently to commands in the house, but at the dog park or around strange people or situations, she generally doesn’t care what we have to say to her.  She loves other dogs, and these days, she’s well-behaved enough to be left in the house for a while without worrying about her.  Lily has a very sweet, playful personality, and like most corgis, she’s very loyal and constantly wants to be around us (or at least in the same room as us).

Interesting tidbit about Lily – most Pembrokes have their tails docked soon after they are born as part of a tradition that doesn’t really mean anything anymore (corgis are herders and originally their tails were docked so livestock wouldn’t step on and injure their tails; these days I think it’s only still done as tradition of the breed).  However, I think Lily is a natural bobtail, as there is absolutely no trace of a tail anywhere on her butt, whereas with most dogs who’ve had their tail docked, there’s a little nub.

After we had Lily for a while, we knew we wanted another corgi.  This time, however, I was pretty adamant: I wanted a merle blue Cardigan girl.  Sam, luckily for me, is just not picky about that kind of stuff, so she was all for it.  This is, without a doubt, the most sought-after Cardigan combination, so out of the already hard to find Cardigans, a blue girl would be even harder.  We put our names on a breeder’s waiting list back in May of this year, expecting to get a puppy around January if the breeder had a mis-marked blue girl (as popular as blue girls are as show dogs, there’s not a large chance the breeder would give one up unless it was mis-marked or they were lucky enough to have two in the same litter).

Sam reached out to this breeder again a couple of months ago to check and see if anything had changed, and everything was still on track for him to have puppies available in January.  However, just a week or two later, he reached out to us with news that one of his breeder friends had a blue girl available the very next weekend because someone had to back out due to some very unfortunate circumstances involving a family member.  Sam reached out to that breeder, she sent us pictures and info, and we immediately knew we wanted her.

MochiThe breeder called her “Star,” and she was incredibly mis-marked in probably the best way possible.  About three-quarters of her face is white, with a black ring around her right eye and a patch of brown and merled blue going back to her ear on the same side.  Her left eye is brown and her right eye is three-quarters blue and a quarter brown.  It’s super cool, and I absolutely love heterochromia in dogs (and in general it’s pretty interesting).  Of course, most of her body is merle blue and white, but she has a splotch of brown on her back feet and a band of it around one of her front legs.

We named her Mochi (yes, like the Japanese pounded rice snack).  The day we picked her up, October 3rd, she turned 9 weeks old (her birthday is August 3rd) and weighed 7.1 lbs.  Her front paws are about as big as Lily’s, and so are her ears, even though she’s so little.  I think this is due to the breed difference, as Pembrokes and Cardigans do vary just a little in physical appearance since they are technically separate (yet very closely related) breeds.

MochiCardigans supposedly are slightly less friendly to strangers than Pembrokes, and (again, supposedly) have a few other personality differences from Pembrokes, but I have yet to be able to tell the difference.  Perhaps it’s because Mochi is so young and we’ve only had her for a little over three weeks, but the way that she interacts with us and the people that have met her seems incredibly familiar to how Lily acted.  Although, I must admit that neither Sam nor I can remember if Lily squirmed quite as much when being held at Mochi’s age, and Mochi definitely barks a bit more than I remember Lily barking when we leave her alone in her crate.

Because Lily likes and gets along so well with other dogs, I never really had any doubt that Lily would have issues with another dog in the house.  She was at first very suspicious, and spent most of the first day doing various things that apparently “asserted her dominance,” according to the Interwebs.  By the second day, though, a lot of that had already faded, and they started playing and doing all of the fun things that dogs do together.  Lily is a very kind big sister to Mochi, or at least I like to think.  Sometimes she bites Mochi’s tail when they’re playfighting, which is kind of funny since Mochi can’t do that back.

Lily and MochiOne of the benefits of having a young adult dog while having a new puppy is that Lily is a good babysitter for Mochi.  With Lily, we had to constantly pay attention to her because we were all she had to play with.  Anyone that’s ever had a puppy probably knows how exhausting that is.  As cute as they are, they’re a handful, and though I’ll miss Mochi being tiny, I do look forward to the day where she stops biting everything and peeing in the house.  It’s nice to be able to leave Lily out when we go to the movies or whatever and not have to worry about her destroying anything or feel bad about having to keep her in a crate.

Anyway, so now we have two dogs, and it’s pretty great, because dogs are the best.

1-Month Gluten-Free Trial

That nerve issue I wrote about at the end of last year never went away.  It’s pretty much a permanent thing at this point, so I kinda have to learn to deal with it.  But hey, there could be worse things!

Anyway, I’ve been to a lot of doctors and done a lot of research on the Internet, and out of desperation, I decided to try going gluten-free for a month, since at this point, the doctors don’t know what’s wrong and just want me to go to pain management clinics.  For the record, if you don’t have celiac disease or a gluten intolerance (which, yes, some people do have), going gluten-free is a total bullshit fad, but that fad has actually helped out people that suffer from gluten-related problems.  There are lots more options for those people on the market now, which I guess is the point of this post.

I went full blown gluten-free for a month, because gluten can cause inflammation (which can cause nerve issues) if you have a gluten intolerance.  This meant I basically acted like I had celiac disease for a month: no wheat, rye, or barley; no foods that shared processing equipment with gluten, and no foods that shared preparation equipment with gluten.  In the past, that might’ve been difficult to do, but these days, it actually wasn’t so bad.

Going gluten-free seems to be more annoying than it is difficult, especially if you have celiac disease.  If you’re just intolerant, you can probably handle cross-contamination a lot better than someone with celiac, but if you have celiac, eating out is almost definitely an ordeal.  Lots of things that should be naturally gluten-free can come into contact with equipment that processes gluten-containing items, which can make things difficult.  For example, Dominos has a gluten-free pizza, but they prepare and bake it in with the same kitchen equipment as their regular pizza, so it is almost certainly contaminated.  Pizza Hut, on the other hand, has their gluten-free pizza and the process they use to store and prepare it certified gluten-free, so theirs is probably safe.  There’s a lot of research that has to go into every decision you make involving anything that goes anywhere near your mouth.

If your significant other just ate a slice of bread, you better not kiss them.  Is your lip balm gluten-free?  Do you share hand-towels with someone that might’ve touched gluten-containing items and then wiped their hands or mouth?  That’s really the most annoying part of the whole process.  I only did it for a month and it ended up not helping me, but for someone that has to do it forever…that could be daunting.

Luckily in Baton Rouge, there is a bakery/restaurant specifically for people that follow diets that eliminate certain food allergens.  They have gluten-free “donuts,” cupcakes, and other pastries, as well as a menu of items that are gluten-free.  And almost every store I went to had a gluten-free section with some pretty interesting options.  The biggest issue, though, is that even when you can find alternatives to things you thought you may never be able to eat again, all of it ends up being pretty expensive.  That restaurant and all of the groceries I bought were probably 25-50% more expensive than comparable gluten-containing options.  As much as that sucks though, at least there are options.

Rice pasta, for example, is such a good imitation of wheat pasta that if it weren’t for the price tag, I wouldn’t care which one you served me.  Trader Joe’s brown rice pasta is $2 for a 16oz bag, whereas wheat pasta is almost half that price.  $2 for a bag of pasta isn’t that much, but a loaf of the best gluten-free bread I could find is EIGHT bucks.  And gluten-free bread is just straight up bleh unless you toast it, which only makes it less bleh.

So, it was an interesting experiment to step into those shoes for an entire month.  Unless you have celiac disease or an intolerance to gluten though, I’m pretty sure you’re crazy if you’re on a gluten-free diet.